- PURE MUSIC VS AUDIRVANA PLUS INSTALL
- PURE MUSIC VS AUDIRVANA PLUS PRO
- PURE MUSIC VS AUDIRVANA PLUS FREE
It all depends on what you like this Mac to do. I agree that the IMac is the cheapest route to go with when you compare the price, specification and you got a screen too. Of course MBP offers maximum portability but highest cost. MacStore is having offering refurbished iMac 21.5inch with 4G RAM and 1TB HDD at 1588.
PURE MUSIC VS AUDIRVANA PLUS PRO
If it works ok, am gonna buy it and give it my impressions :)īetween a Macmini, Macbook Pro and iMac, which one would you choose to be the music server? The only thing holding me back on MacMini is the higher cost plus the need to get other accessories to get it complete.
PURE MUSIC VS AUDIRVANA PLUS INSTALL
Have downloaded the demo but waiting to try out iTunes plain first, then install PureMusic for a comparison later this week. I'm glad that Pure Music didn't make that decision for the listener rather it is giving them endless options to choose from. It offers a few different methods of this, "Maximum Fidelity" and "NOS type classic." This caters to just about every listener out there, I say this with confidence as I know people that enjoy digital upsampling and those that despise it. Now, if one wants to "upsample" the music, you have that option too. Pure Music keeps it real it's a bit-by-bit perfect representation of the file itself. Yeah, the GUI says they're off but I can hear some interesting things on playback that bother me. Gone is the veil that iTunes seems to place on it's output, the vast filters and EQ's that I can't seem to just turn off. I can also say that support of the product has been top notch! I almost immediately get a response back to my questions. That has been resolved in the latest version from the folks at Channel D. In the beginning it had some issues where it was a bit quirky, playback would stop all of a sudden, or it wouldn't go to the next track. Listening impressions only, please.So how about the sound? I can say that I prefer to run Pure Music 100% of the time now. There are better existing threads for that.
PURE MUSIC VS AUDIRVANA PLUS FREE
I wanted to gather other listener's impressions, which one they prefer, and why.īoth have been bug free for me, and I'd appreciate if the conversation didn't get sidetracked by the user interface / bugs / other tech issues etc. Sometimes I prefer one, other times the other. There's a difference in the tonality of the instruments between the two, but not sure which one's more lifelike. It also has a slightly more dynamic sound. However, sometimes it feels as if the sound is slightly hard. Pure Music has slightly better detail retrieval - it seems as if the curtains have been pulled, and you can peerĭeep into the music. Also seems to very slightly lack in dynamics, compared to Pure Music. However, sometimes it feels slightly veiled - especially when compared to Pure Music. Sometimes it seems that it makes the music sound more beautiful, syrupy almost. In the current versions, these two seem fairly close to me: the differences:Īudirvana seems to have a more analog / tube-like sound. I recently fell into this music player rabbit hole, and after extensive testing, I'm down to Pure Music & Audirvana.
0 kommentar(er)
